ExperimentBuilder

(2012年4月25日 更新)

■Matsumoto, H., Terao, Y., Yugeta, A., Fukuda, A., Emoto, M.,Furubayashi, T., Okano, T., Hanajima, R., & Ugawa, Y.(2011). Where doneurologists look when viewing brain CT images? An eye-tracking studyinvolving stroke cases. PLoS One, 6, e28928.

■Abegg, M., Lee H., & Barton, J. J. S. (2010). Systematic diagonal and vertical errors in antisaccades and memory-guided saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(3):5, 1-10.
■Abegg, M., Manoach, D. S., Barton, J. J. S. (2011). Knowing the future: partial foreknowledge effects on the programming of prosaccades and antisaccades. Vision Research, 51, 215-221.
■Abegg, M., Rodriguez, A. R., Lee1, H., & Barton, J. J. S. (2010). 'Alternate-goal bias' in antisaccades and the influence of expectation. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 553-562.
■Anderson, N. C., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (in press). Exploiting human sensitivity to gaze for tracking the eyes. Behavior Research Methods,
■Becker, M. W., & Rasmussen, I. P. (2007). The rhythm aftereffect: Support for time sensitive neurons with broad overlapping tuning curves. Brain and Cognition. 64, 274-281.
■Bindemann, M., Scheepers, C., & Burton, A. M. (2009). Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision, 9(2):7, 1-16, http://journalofvision.org/9/2/7/, doi:10.1167/9.2.7.
■Bindemann, M., Scheepers, C., Ferguson, H. J., & Burton, A. M. (2010). Face, body, and center of gravity mediate person detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1477-1485.
■Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C, Fiset, D., & Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(8): e3022.
■Bond, G. D. (2008). Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behavior. 32, 339-351.
■Calvo, M. G., & Eysenck, M. W. (2008). Affective significance enhances covert attention: Roles of anxiety and word familiarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Perception, 61, 1669-1686.
■Caplan, D. (2010). Task effects on BOLD signal correlates of implicit syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 866-890.
■Carbone, E., & Schneider, W. X. (2010). The control of stimulus-driven saccades is subject not to central, but to visual attention limitations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2168-2175.
■Chica, A. B., Klein, R. M., Rafal, R. D., & Hopfinger, J. B. (2010). Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: Failure to replicate rafal, calabresi, brennan, & sciolto (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
■Chica, A. B., Taylor, T. L., Lupiáñez, J., & Klein, R. M. (2010). Two mechanisms underlying inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 25-35.
■Chen, L., & Boland, J. (2008). Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1306-1323.
■Cristino, F., & Baddeley, R. (2009). The nature of the visual representations involved in eye movements when walking down the street. Visual Cognition, 17, 880-903.
■Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 43-50.
■Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Eye Tracking of men's preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 51-58.
■Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass - eye tracking reveals men's appreciation of the female form. Human Nature, 21, 355-370.
■Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilésa, A., Afonso, O., Scheepers, C., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition, 110, 284-292.
■Elahipanah, A., Christensen, B. K., & Reingold, E. M. (2008). Visual selective attention among persons with schizophrenia: The distractor ratio effect. Schizophrenia Research. 105, 61-67.
■Elahipanah, A., Christensen, B. K., & Reingold, E. M. (2010). Visual search performance among persons with schizophrenia as a function of target eccentricity. Neuropsychology, 24, 192-198.
■Elahipanah, A., Christensen, B. K., & Reingold, E. M. (2011). What can eye movements tell us about Symbol Digit substitution by patients with schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Research, 127, 137-143.
■Elahipanah, A., Christensen, B. K., & Reingold, E. M. (in press). Attentional guidance during visual search among patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research,
■Engelhardt, P. E., Ferreira, F., & Patsenko, E. G. (2010). Pupillometry reveals processing load during spoken language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 639-645.
■Fleming, K. K., Bandy, C. L., & Kimble, M. O. (2010). Decisions to shoot in a weapon identification task: The influence of cultural stereotypes and perceived threat on false positive errors. Social Neuroscience, 5, 201-220.
■Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117, 319-331.
■Foulsham, T., Teszka, R., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 266-283.
■Fuchs, I., Ansorge, U., Redies, C., & Leder, H. (2011). Salience in paintings: Bottom-up influences on eye fixations. Cognitive Computation, 3, 25-36.
■Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F. (in press). Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction. Behavior Research Methods,
■Henderson, J. M., Chanceaux, M., & Smith, T. J. (2009). The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: Evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9(1):32, 1-8, http://journalofvision.org/9/1/32/, doi:10.1167/9.1.32.
■Henderson, J. M., & Pierce, G. L. (2008). Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 15, 566-573.
■Henderson, J. M., & Smith, T. J. (2009). How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm. Visual Cognition, 17, 1055-1082.
■Hermens, F., & Walker, R. (2010). Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2120-2140.
■Hermens, F., & Walker, R. (2010). The influence of onsets and offsets on saccade programming. i-Perception, 1, 83-94.
■Hermens, F., Zanker, J. M., & Walker, R. (2010). Microsaccades and preparatory set: A comparison between delayed and immediate, exogenous and endogenous pro- and anti-saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 489-498.
■Higgins, J. S., & Wang, R. F. (2010). A landmark effect in the perceived displacement of objects. Vision Research, 50, 242-248.
■Howard, l. R., Kumaran, D., Ólafsdóttir, H. F., & Spiers, H. J. (2011). Double dissociation between hippocampal and parahippocampal responses to object-background context and scene novelty. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 5253-5261.
■Jack, R. E., Blais, C., Scheepers, C., Schyns, P. G., & Caldara, R. (2009). Cultural confusions show that facial expressions are not universal. Current Biology, 19, 1543-1548.
■Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V.-M., & Koskela, K. (2009). The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 509-526.
■Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., Hatzidaki, A., & Obregón, M. (2010). Is the 'naming' deficit in dyslexia a misnomer? Cognition, 116, 56-70.
■Kimble, M. O., Fleming, K., Bandy, C., Kim, J., & Zambetti, A. (2010). Eye tracking and visual attention to threating stimuli in veterans of the Iraq war. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 293-299.
■Kita, Y., Gunji, A., Inoue, Y., Goto, T., Sakihara, K., Kaga, M., Inagaki, M., & Hosokawa, T. (2011). Self-face recognition in children with autism spectrum disorders: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain and Development, 33, 494-503.
■Kita. Y., Gunji, A., Sakihara, K., Inagaki, M., Kaga, M., Nakagawa, E., & Hosokawa, T. (2010). Scanning strategies do not modulate face identification: Eye-tracking and near-infrared spectroscopy study. PLoS ONE 5(6): e11050. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011050.
■Koehn, J. D., Roy, E., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). The 'diagonal effect': a systematic error in oblique antisaccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100, 587-597.
■Kuhn, G., Benson, V., Fletcher-Watson, S., Kovshoff, H., McCormick, C. A., Kirkby, J., & Leekam, S. R. (2010). Eye movements affirm: automatic overt gaze and arrow cueing for typical adults and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 155-165.
■Kuhn, G., & Findlay, J. M. (2010). Misdirection, attention and awareness: Inattentional blindness reveals temporal relationship between eye movements and visual awareness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 136-146.
■Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 314-327.
■Kuhn, G., Kourkoulou, A., & Leekam, S. R. (2010). How magic changes our expectations about autism. Psychological Science, 21, 1487-1493.
■Kuhn, G., Tatler, B. W., & Cole, G. (2009). You look where I look! Effect of gaze cues on overt and covert attention in misdirection. Visual Cognition, 17, 925-944.
■Kuhn, G., & Tipples, J. (2011). Increased gaze following for fearful faces. It depends on what you’re looking for! Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 89-95.
■Lee, H., Abegg, M., Rodriguez, A., Koehn, J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2010). Why do humans make antisaccade errors? Experimental Brain Research, 201, 65-73.
■Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525-552.
■Liu, C.-L., Tseng, P., Chiau, H.-Y., Liang, W.-K., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., Muggleton, N. G., Juan, C. H. (2011). The location probability effects of saccade reaction times are modulated in the frontal eye fields but not in the supplementary eye field. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1416-1425.
■Loschky, L. C., Hansen, B. C., Sethi, A., & Pydimarri, T. N. (2010). The role of higher order image statistics in masking scene gist recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 427-444.
■Malcolm, G. L. & Henderson, J. M. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9(11):8, 1-13, http://journalofvision.org/9/11/8/, doi:10.1167/9.11.8.
■Malcolm, G. L. & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. Journal of Vision, 10(2):4, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/10/2/4/, doi:10.1167/10.2.4.
■Malpass, D., & Meyer, A. S. (2010). The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: Evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 523-537.
■Meadmore, K. L., Dror, I. E., Bucks, R. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements during visuospatial judgements. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 92-101.
■Mital, P., Smith, T., Hill, R., & Henderson, J. (2011). Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation, 3, 5-24.
■Mitra, A. R., Abegg, M., Viswanathan, J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2010). Line bisection in simulated homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1742-1749.
■Nuthmann, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. Journal of Vision, 10(8):20, 1-19, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/8/20, doi:10.1167/10.8.20.
■Parrott, S. E., Levinthal, B. R., & Franconeri, S. L. (2011). Complex attentional control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2297-2304.
■Patsenko, E. G., & Altmann, E. M. (2010). How planful is routine behavior? A selective-attention model of performance in the Tower of Hanoi. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 95-116.
■Patson, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 464-486.
■Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2011). Building complex reference objects from dual sets. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 443-459.
■Reichle, E. D., Vanyukov, P. M., Laurent, P. A., & Warren, T. (2008). Serial or parallel? Using depth-of-processing to examine attention allocation during reading. Vision Research, 48, 1831-1836.
■Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 978-996.
■Ren, Y., Xuan, Y., & Fu, X. (2007). Effects of Pattern Complexity on Information Integration: Evidence from Eye Movements. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 4562, 582-590.
■Richardson, B. A., Ratneswaran, A., Lyons, J., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2011). The time course of online trajectory corrections in memory-guided saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 212, 457-469.
■Rosenberg, J., Pusch, K., Dietrich, R., & Cajochen, C. (2009). The tick-tock of language: Is language processing sensitive to circadian rhythmicity and elevated sleep pressure? Chronobiology International, 26, 974 - 991.
■Rossit, S., Szymanek, L., Butler, S. H., & Harvey, M. (2010). Memory-guided saccade processing in visual form agnosia (patient DF). Experimental Brain Research, 200, 109-116.
■Ryan, J. D., Riggs, L., & McQuiggan, D. (2010). Eye mvement monitoring of memory. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 42, https://www.jove.com/index/details.stp?id=2108, doi: 10.3791/2108.
■Schleifer, P., & Landerl, K. (2011). Subitizing and counting in typical and atypical development. Developmental Science, 14, 280-291.
■Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251-272.
■Smilek, D., Solman, G. J. F., Murawski, P., & Carriere, J. S. A. (2009). The eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 57-61.
■Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Edit Blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2):6, 1-17.
■Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Facilitation of return during scene viewing. Visual Cognition, 17, 1083-1108.
■Solman, G. J. F., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2011). Memory load affects visual search processes without influencing search efficiency. Vision Research, 51, 1185-1191.
■Solman, G. J. F., & Smilek, D. (2010). Item-specific location memory in visual search. Vision Research, 50, 2430-2438.
■Srimal, R., & Curtis, C. E. (2010). Secondary adaptation of memory-guided saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 35-46.
■Tremblay, A. (2011). Learning to parse liaison-initial words: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 257-279.
■Wang, C.-A., & Inhoff, A. W. (2010). The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 805-817.
■Wang, C.-A., Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2009). Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1487-1494.
■Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D., Gordon, R. D., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2007). Tracking the evil eye: Trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. Journal of Research in Personality. 41, 650-666.
■Wilson, A., Wilson, A., ten Hove, M. W., Pareacute, M., & Munhall, K. G. (2008). Loss of Central Vision and Audiovisual Speech Perception. Visual Impairment Research. 10, 23-34.
■Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3):24, 1-15, http://journalofvision.org/9/3/24/, doi:10.1167/9.3.24.
■Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. Journal of Vision, 10(3):14, 1-13, http://journalofvision.org/10/3/14/, doi:10.1167/10.3.14.
■Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (in press). Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
■Võ, M. L.-H., & Schneider, W. X. (2010). A glimpse is not a glimpse: Differential processing of flashed scene previews leads to differential target search benefits. Visual Cognition, 18, 171-200.
■Võ, M. L.-H., Schneider, W. X., & Matthias, E. (2008). Transsaccadic scene memory revisited: A 'Theory of Visual Attention (TVA)' based approach to recognition memory and confidence for objects in naturalistic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2):7, 1-13.
■Weaver, M. D., & Lauwereyns, J. (2011). Attentional capture and hold: the oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces. Psychological Research, 75, 10-23.
■Weaver, M. D., Lauwereyns, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). The effect of semantic information on saccade trajectory deviations. Vision Research, 51, 1124-1128.
■Weaver, M. D., Phillips, J., & Lauwereyns, J. (2010). Semantic influences from a brief peripheral cue depend on task set. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1249-1255.
■Wengelin, Å., Torrance, M., Holmqvist, K., Simpson, S., Galbraith, D., Johansson, V., & Johansson, R. (2009). Combined eye-tracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 337-351.
■Winskel, H. (2009). Reading in Thai: the case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing, 22, 1-24.
■Winterboer, A. K., Tietze, M. I., Wolters, M. K., & Moore, J. D. (2011). The user model-based summarize and refine approach improves information presentation in spoken dialog systems. Computer Speech & Language, 25, 175-191.
■Yang, S.-N., Tai, Y.-C., Laukkanen, H., & Sheedy, J. (2009). Effects of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on near foveal letter recognition. Vision Research, 49, 2881-2890.
■Zelinsky, G. J., & Schmidt, J. (2009). An effect of referential scene constraint on search implies scene segmentation, Visual Cognition, 17, 1004-1028.
■Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). Spatial working memory load impairs manual but not saccadic inhibition of return. Vision Research, 51, 147-153.